Data Integrity & ALCOA++ principles in GxP continuous monitoring Paul Daniel Senior GxP Regulatory Expert Published: Feb 4, 2023 Life Science In our recent webinar “GxP data integrity: What you don't know may make you non-compliant” we received many questions. Vaisala Senior GxP Regulations expert Paul Daniel has answered all questions by email, but here we share a few of his answers in blog form. In this blog, we will focus on questions related to ALCOA. The acronym stands for Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate. Later, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) added four more items that focus more on data management: Complete, Consistent, Enduring and Available. Rather than change the acronym to ALCOACCEA, we now use ALCOA++. But how does ALCOA++ relate to data integrity? Here we refer to the definition of data integrity in the FDA 2018 document “Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry” What is “data integrity”? For the purposes of this guidance, data integrity refers to the completeness, consistency, and accuracy of data. Complete, consistent, and accurate data should be attributable, legible, contemporaneously recorded, original or a true copy, and accurate (ALCOA). Question: What are the requirements for electronic signature to comply with ALCOA principle? Paul Daniel: This sounds like a big question, but in regard to monitoring systems, the answer is fairly straightforward. A monitoring system is a specialized system, unlike a classic automation system, it does few things: record, monitor, alarm. A monitoring system involves a physical network of monitoring sensors. Electronic Signature, as a function of a program, is another computer system. To ensure it does what it is intended to do, an electronic signature system needs a way of verifying device identity. In addition, its important that users understand that their electronic signature is as legal and binding as any paper signature. So, I would expect that standard data integrity controls for electronic records would suffice, with a little extra emphasis on A for Attributable. Having said all that, I need to qualify my statements because I do not specialize in Electronic Signature controls, so I recommend that you consult some other sources as you put together your Data Integrity controls for a system with Electronic Signature capabilities. Question: In the webinar, I think you missed the TRACEABLE requirement from the new GLP. Paul Daniel: Yes, thank you! You are correct that Traceable is the newest addition to the acronym ALCOA, now ALCOA++ as of 2021. The only publication where I have seen this specifically added is in a 2021 draft guideline from the EMA intended for clinical trials, though there may be something more recent. From that document: Data integrity is achieved when data (irrespective of media) are collected and maintained in a secure manner, to fulfil the ALCOA++ principles of being attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate, complete, consistent, enduring and traceable as described in section 4.5 in order for the data to adequately support robust results and good decision making throughout the data life cycle. Assuring data integrity requires appropriate quality and risk management systems as described in section 4.6., including adherence to sound scientific principles and good documentation practices. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) is likely the most sensitive area of GxP in regard to data integrity. This makes sense because a great deal of raw data is collected and analyzed or interpreted to give usable final data and results. I did not mention traceability independently in the webinar, because when I used the Vaisala viewLinc monitoring system as an example, most of the elements of traceability are covered under Attributable and Contemporaneous. In monitoring applications, it is important to know when and where the data was collected (time and device ID). But once the data is in the viewLinc database, it is protected from any future changes. I decided to leave out Traceability as an independent item for data integrity in a Monitoring System. I hope you forgive this choice. Here is a round up of links that refer to ALCOA and ALCOA++ Guidance for Industry: Electronic Source Data In Clinical Investigations, FDA 2013 ISPE GAMP Guide: Records and Data Integrity ISPE 2017 GXP Data Integrity Guidance and Definitions MHRA 2018 Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP: Questions and Answers Guidance For Industry FDA (2018) Guideline on computerised systems and electronic data in five clinical trials (draft) EMA 2021
viewLinc Continuous Monitoring System (CMS) Continuous Monitoring System for Controlled Environments and GxP Applications: Monitor Temperature, Humidity & Universal Input data loggers.
Validation mapping kit Ideal for stability chambers, refrigerators, freezers, incubators, warehouses, ambient environments and other demanding studies.
VaiNet Wireless Temperature & Humidity Data Logger RFL100 The RFL100 data loggers use Vaisala’s proprietary VaiNet wireless technology to monitor environments ranging from warehouses, to production areas, to cleanrooms and laboratories
VaiNet wireless CO2 data logger RFL100 The RFL series data loggers use Vaisala’s LoRa® based VaiNet wireless technology to monitor CO2 in incubators and chambers.
21 CFR Part 11 Learning module In this learning module "Understanding 21 CFR Part 11 & Annex 11 we provide several ways to learn about the "elevens" as they pertain to continuous monitoring systems. On-demand Webinar: CMS Compliance with Part 11 and Annex 11 - Easier than you think 21 CFR Part 11 Application Note Annex 11 Application Note Start learning